Organic warfare, the new kind of war that's been going on for decades.
- Nico Vansimpsen
- 11 jun
- 4 minuten om te lezen
Bijgewerkt op: 12 jun
Organic warfare is not new; it is a phenomenon that has existed for at least two decades and was invented much earlier than that.
Organic warfare originates just after the fall of communism in the USSR.
Countries like China realize that a conventional war against the West, and certainly against the U.S., cannot be won, at least not without massive destruction of infrastructure and the loss of millions of lives.
Therefore, the East, China, produced different ideas.
Ideas such as an intellectual war in which the education system is slowly dismantled by no longer making the gathering and retention of knowledge the foundation but instead focusing on emotions rather than intellect.
This is how radical ideas, such as a biological man being able to bear children, arise.
And if they can make our children believe such things, then believing in communism as a viable political and economic alternative becomes a easy.
The problem is that you cannot bring a country on the brink of collapse solely through an intellectual war, education, etc.
You also need people to speed up that proces, people who have no affinity with the country they live in, people who do not want to contribute but only take instead of also giving.
And what method is easier than immigration, preferably illegal immigration?
Because legal immigrants come for the right reasons and rarely pose a problem for the country they move to.
Illegal immigrants usually do not always have the purest motives. Illegal immigrants also bring other benefits for countries like China, such as drugs, human trafficking, slave trade, child abuse, etc.
The organic part of organic warfare is bringing together all the other factors, and when all the other elements are built up and come together, only then do you start to see actual results that divide and destroy a country.
Every country, including the US, has its tipping point.
When cities contain more foreigners who have different languages and cultures, thereby displacing the locally born and bred American and European residents, then you know that they are winning. When the established social system of healthcare, pensions, and social care is on the verge of collapse, then a country like China knows they are on the right track.
When a country no longer has unity over a controversial policy such as migration, then a country like China is convinced that they are stronger.

Organic war is the most passive war that countries like China can wage.
And China is no longer alone; they have since established their own coalition BRICS, pulling all in the same direction.
Brazil, Russia, India, and South Africa are all working together toward the same unified goal: undermining and destroying Western democracy, including its capitalistic free market system.
Consciously or unconsciously, many federal and local politicians are contributing to the downfall of their own country.
Some have been bought by the CCP, others believe they are doing the right thing and think that socialism and communism are the solution.
These politicians cooperate by advocating for a policy of low or even zero emissions, all under the guise of climate change and saving the planet.
While China continues to produce and pollute as the leader in the Organic war, thus becoming richer than its competing countries.
Many believe that we have been living in peace in the West and the EU for 80 years.
That is not entirely true.
We have never stopped waging war; the manner of waging war has simply changed from a destructive violent war to a passive economic war.
A war that the communist USSR lost under political and economic policy which was communism and from which Communist China has learned how not to do it.
Every war, no matter where and when, is always about the accumulation of land, resources, and power.
Those who can produce the most in terms of goods and services, as well as enhance their own economy, will win.
Germany lost because they could no longer perform economically due to their factories and infrastructure being bombed to pieces.
But what you destroy also needs to be rebuilt, and that costs a lot of money.
The USSR lost the Cold War because no one stood up to earn the same as everyone else. Communism undermined the willingness to work for an economy in the long run.
And under communism, unemployment was not possible, so at one point, there were hundreds of thousands, even millions of writers in the USSR.
Another word for the unemployed.
So, a better way is an Organic war where you first destroy the culture than industry and economy will then follow automatically.
By undermining their own potential to produce, many young people become demotivated, they see no future for themselves and no longer want to work for a government that, in their eyes, is taking away the money from their labor.
The problem is that the youth in an organic war do not believe that the government will take away their prosperity.
The youth, under the guidance of education controlled by leftist radicals, sometimes paid and supported by communist China, believe that it is the wealthy entrepreneurs and companies that are ruining their future by not paying their fair share of taxes.
A scenario we recognize from Marxism.
What we see today in the US and EU is the conclusion of the Organic War.
Large numbers of illegal migrants supported by left radicals and sometimes funded with money from communist countries, contributions from people like Soros help to attack local and federal police and security services.
Their goal is to clear the way for the BRICS countries, led by China, to make the US completely dependent on the communist CCP and do so without firing a single shot.
Communists have learned that the biggest Achilles' heel of capitalism is individual greed, which China relies on to buy off politicians and officials.
And if countries like China succeed, the US and even the EU will turn into a Zimbabwe of this century.
Opmerkingen